Muche Magnifier

Legal Precedent, by analysis

 

Out of Need to be as thorough as possible,
The Below Legal Analysis from Supreme Court Stare Decisis on Treason is hereby included:
from "Temperance's Resurrection of Respect," Page I Ann. xxviii, included here on 3/27/14
http://magnummagnifier.com/one-more-epilogue-republicans-and-democrats-mutual-need/temperances-resurrection-of-respect/

 

xxviii [Uploaded with Part IV on 12/13/13]

 

[Not pending, Already Annotated since 1807, 
http://sashamuc0.wix.com/movingon#!epilogue-to-move-on-annotations-pended/c1l62

 

Treason: “The opinion of the Supreme Court is that an individual may be guilty of Treason who has not (personally) appeared in arms against his country; that if war
[meaning also including an attack against an embassy and therefore with possible effect of starting a war] that if war actually be levied, that is, if a body of men be
actually assembled [specifically in a meeting, as in by a board] 
for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable object
[such as intended-instigative video to start global riots against the United States,
one of which: so as included: for a body of men to attack the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi]

 

(or financial war, as described in “Heroes to Prequel Success,” ann. Xxxvi [below])]

 

ALL THOSE WHO PERFORM ANY PART, HOWEVER MINUTE
or HOWEVER REMOTE FROM the SOURCE OF ACTION
AND WHO ARE ACTUALLY LEAGUED IN THE GENERAL CONSPIRACY
[including by instigator-mail first sourced to a body of men assembled by meeting,
then effected by attack,
to undermine-by-slander the (non-partisan-office) of the Executive Branch of the USA]
 

ARE TO BE CONSIDERED TRAITORS.” → GUILTY OF TREASON.

 

- Chief Justice John Marshall. “United States. v. Burr. 25 Fed Cas. 55 no 14 693 (c.c. D.va. 1807)

 

Kurland, Phillip. The Founders Constitution. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL. (1987). v. IV, P. 458. (print).

 

“Force (n) – Power, violence, or pressure directed against a person or thing.”

 

-Garner, Bryan. Blacks Law Dictionary, 8th Ed. West Group Publishing Co. St Paul, MN. (1999). (print).

 

 

 

By this definition of force and Chief Justice’s definition of Treason = war = Force,
Senator Bernie **Sanders**

**[at first, in learning, referenced as/with Mr. Smith Goes to Washington's lesson on filibuster
(Columbia Studios, 1939), at the time taught by Rachel Maddow on The Rachel Maddow Show]**
(Maddow, Rachel [Relational-understanding illuminating a libertarian current event]. "Filibuster."

The Rachel Maddow Show. MSNBC Studios: New York, NY.  

(also combining [subconsciously, and in frustration-of-soon-seeking-refuge] as/with Rep B.Frank in the original citation of "Heroes Against Takeover Dispersement, Part II," ann. xxvii
http://sashamuc0.wix.com/movingon#!heroes-against-takeoverdispersement-pii/c9q3 )


gave United States’ last Real (to Cruz) Meaningful (to Paul) filibuster
on “war against the disappearing and shrinking middle class.”

[*** Although Senator Paul's full-filibuster was made in sincerity,
unlike other Republican nomination*-*filibusters only for the point of obstruction

http://sashamuc0.wix.com/movingon#!heroes-against-takeoverdispersement-pii/c9q3  [Paragraph 2B and Amendment Below]

against United States of America executive office, and thereby -as obstructions- for anarchy.*[

 

Financial War Against the Public Further evidenced by annotation in “Heroes to Prequel Success, Ann. Xxxvi. http://sashamuc0.wix.com/movingon#!heroes-to-prequel-success/c1s3b

 

[-In analysis and rebuff to Paul's Empty-Filibuster

http://sashamuc0.wix.com/movingon#!heroes-against-takeoverdispersement-pii/c9q3 (par. 2B)

 

 -In analysis and rebuff to Cruz's Fake-Filibuster
"'Republican Freakshow' Schmidt discussed  is made by Cruz: who both sides are ashamed of. Wasting taxpayer time by reading, at his level, Green Eggs: Ham,
Cruz led non-tactical, fake-filibusters.

 

Cruz’ antics, that one senior GOP aide noted 'make [him] have a hard time walking down stairs, because Cruz can’t think one step ahead of himself' (Maddow. 9/24/13.), are the reason constituents like Patrick-Harris note on The Emmys how under Congress’ Dome,
reps 'are so out of touch with reality.'"

 

-Paragraphs 4 and 5 of "Good 'Ol Traditional Republicans"]
(Only these two paragraphs about the present "Republican Freakshow" identified by Schmidt;
THE REST OF REPORT EVIDENCING NEED TO RETURN TO PAST GOOD REPUBLICAN EXAMPLES.
http://magnummagnifier.com/#/analytic-fiscal-mediation/good-ol-traditional-republicans/ )]
 

 

 

 Back to Supreme Court definition: how big-money setup Benghazi Attack as Treason AGAINST the Executive Office and the United States

 

“United States, [has] no public enemy, [so] it is only the first branch of this definition which will require your attention with all the solicitude which was felt by the
framers of our constitution to produce certainty and to exclude interpretation in a matter so momentous, and with all their circumspection to avoid the use of terms in
any degree vague or indefinite, cases have already occurred in this country, and will, no doubt again\arise in which it will be difficult to say.
[The processes] actually to-levy war are distinct offenses:

 

 

the first must be brought into operation by assemblage of men.”[evidenced as present below]

- Chief Justice Livingston. U.S. v. Hoxie 26 Fed. Cas. 397, no. 15,407 (C.C.D. Va. (1808).”
Kurland, Phillip. The Founders Constitution. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL. (1987). v. IV, p. 461. (print).

 

 

- The assemblages of men causing the effect-of attack for political manipulation and election-theft have been defined here as

 

1) The first assemblage of men: “a body of men actually assembled [specifically in a meeting,
as in by a board] [again]: that is if a body of men actually be assembled
for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable object
[such as intended-instigative video to start global riots against United States, one of which: so as
included: for a body of men to attack U.S. embassy in Benghazi](from US v. Burr definition above)

*****3/27/14 UPDATED*****
FOR AFFECT OF ATTACK TO BE COMMITTED AGAINST THE U.S.A.,
- AS THE 1/15/14 U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, Speical Report on the Benghazi Attack

 

http://www.intelligence.senate.gov/benghazi2014/benghazi.pdf

(direct report, with one disclosure of finding pinpointed on PAGES 24, and 25, Further in Part II)

 

http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/#/?chapt=0
(KirkPatrick, David D. “A Deadly Mix in Benghazi,” paragraphs 21, 19. The New York Times: New York, NY. 12/28/13.)

 

http://magnummagnifier.com/temperances-resurrection-of-respect-page-2/report-10-full/

("Intelligence Report 10-3, Temperance," continued paragraph 6A.1[.3])
http://magnummagnifier.com/#/reports-11-12-temperances-resurrection-of-respect-page-5/
("Intelligence Report 11, Temperance," paragraph 6A.2.3)
 

confirmed by U.S. Intelligence Agencies how the Instigative Video acted as an affect for attack
-THEREBY MAKING SUCH AFFECTS BY INSTIGATION FOR ATTACKS ALSO TREASON.
*****3/27/14 UPDATED*****
 

 

2)A second assemblage of men, effecting from first assemblage of men, are who actually committed attack in force of arms:
AS EFFECT FROM THE FIRST ASSEMBLAGE OF MEN [BY MEETING]

 

The setup attack (as above evidenced): with global riots including attack on US embassy was made 

so as to invent a witch-hunt to slander and overthrow our U.S.A.'s elected Executive Office** by attack for political-manipulation

 

so it IS “a purpose treasonable in itself”: punishable by death.

 

 

 

More detail about the Rationale of Treason [as committed in attack-to-slander] its Consequences, and the Reason,

- The Founders Constitution on the reason Treason is Piracy, and Why Consequence for Both is the Death Penalty
[Yes, Dr. Haney(Psych & Law professor against-Death-Penalty], The Death Penalty,
to get-rid of evil-socializing Traitors]

 

 

 

“I have hitherto considered crimes, which wound the community through sides of individuals…
The Question now arising is the following – is such or such [ie: instigated riots, including attack on an U.S. embassy] a war levied against the United States?… If it is
levied on account of some private quarrel or to take revenge on particular persons [ie:Mr. Barack Obama, just because of, say, racist personal-conception by
money-power funders/representatives]
…[for] a private claim of right… WITHOUT ANY OTHER CLAIM OF INTERESTS is not levying war against US”[437]

 

- BUT, since that individual, Mr. Barack Obama: who was to-him instigated-on with riots, including attack on U.S. Embassy setup by intended-video [made-as-
planned in/from Cerritos, OC] setup to slander him, President Barack Obama:

 

is President of the United States of America, and that slander was used for political manipulation: and thus for election theft, there were other claims of interest in

all the setup of levied war against US: as defined by Chief Justice Marshall.

 

With other claims of interest, this setup of levied war against the United States o f America is thus defined Treason.

 

 

 

“Insurrections in order to… alter the established law as to render it ineffectual [Especially regarding U.S. Electoral Processes as were attacked through the

subsequent setup-slander for political manipulation/election theft: further described above] – insurrections to accomplish these ends, by numbers and an open

and armed force [such as setup-for anti-U.S. global riots including an attack on U.S.'s Consulate in Benghazi], are a levying of war against the United
States.” [438]

 

 

“In the United States and in Pennsylvania, treason is punished in the same manner as other capital crimes. A traitor is hostile to his country; a pirate is the

enemy of mankind – hotis humani generis. Piracy is robbery and depredation on the high seas: and it is a crime against the universal law of society. By declaring

war against the whole human race [for greed agendas], the pirate has laid the whole human race under necessity of declaring war against him.” (439)

 

 

[By this understanding, the whole society is under attack by the political-manipulation through attack committed by intended-instigative video: as-bought: with

intended effect of insurrection in global anti-US riots: that included attack... so needs consequence.]

 

 

Wilson, James. “Of Crimes Immediate Against the Constitution.” The Founders Constitution. Phillip, K. Lerner, R. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL. v.IV.

(pps. 437, 438,. 439).

 

Previously exposed as to culpability in “Mission, Investigation”: FBI Cooperative Report http://magnummagnifier.com/empowered-legacies-that-many-live/mission-investigation/  (paragraph 5)